In an
interview with The Wall Street Journal Cormac McCarthy talks about
goodness and his son, John. McCarthy says his son is morally a wonderful
person. He also says that's just who John is as a person and that
goodness isn't something you learn; it's just something you have or
don't.
Everyone is born with morals, and as we 'grow' and 'learn' these morals
often fall away. It's like a ball that is constantly being thrown around
and hit at and the ball gets ratted and worn, but its up to the person
to keep the ball in good condition, and if they don't you won't even be
able to use it any more; it'll just be a piece of crap. And some damage
done to the ball can be reversed with a little cleaning but major damage
can't always be fixed. So young children come automatically with these
morals, these things that they know are right. And if this sense of
morality is cultivated and encouraged at a young age then their morality
can grow and become stronger. But if it isn't, their morals can easily
fall away. And this goes on throughout a person's life, the world can
chip away at their morals. But if the world can take away someone's
morals, why can't it give them back? Sure, learning to be moral is
harder than learning to be corrupt, but it's not impossible. So I guess I
agree and disagree with McCarthy; I agree in that you're born with
morals and they can be destroyed but I disagree in that I take the less
cynical view (believe me, that's probably the last time you'll hear me
say that) and I think you can learn morals from our world, as difficult
as it may be. Back to the ball analogy, no matter how beat up your ball
of morality is, you can always get a new one.
Thanks,
Gianna.
do you think that we can gain morals, as opposed to stay where we are or lose morals as we progress in lizzife?
ReplyDelete